Journal of VLSI Circuits and Systems https://vlsijournal.com/index.php/vlsi <p>The <em>Journal of VLSI Circuits and Systems</em> is a peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-impact research in the field of Very-Large-Scale Integration (VLSI) design and systems engineering. The journal provides a platform for disseminating cutting-edge innovations that span the full spectrum of theoretical advances, simulation models, architecture design, physical implementations, and system-level integration in VLSI technology. (ISSN - 2582-1458)</p> <p>The journal invites original research papers, reviews, and application-driven studies that explore novel methodologies, tools, and trends across digital, analog, mixed-signal, and RF integrated circuits, as well as embedded and neuromorphic systems.</p> <p><strong>The journal covers a broad spectrum of topics related to VLSI circuits and systems, including but not limited to:</strong></p> <ol> <li><strong> VLSI Circuit Design</strong></li> </ol> <ul> <li>Low-power, high-speed digital circuit design methodologies.</li> <li>Analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits (ADC/DACs, PLLs, oscillators).</li> <li>Emerging logic families: adiabatic, quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA), reversible logic.</li> <li>Radiation-hardened and fault-tolerant circuit design.</li> <li>Clocking strategies, synchronization circuits, and time-interleaved designs.</li> </ul> <ol start="2"> <li><strong> Design Automation and EDA Tools</strong></li> </ol> <ul> <li>Hardware Description Languages (HDL), High-Level Synthesis (HLS), and Register Transfer Level (RTL) design.</li> <li>Placement, routing, and layout optimization.</li> <li>Logic and physical synthesis for power, performance, and area (PPA).</li> <li>AI/ML-driven EDA and design space exploration.</li> <li>Formal verification, equivalence checking, and constraint-driven simulation.</li> </ul> <ol start="3"> <li><strong> VLSI System Architectures</strong></li> </ol> <ul> <li>System-on-Chip (SoC), Network-on-Chip (NoC), and Chiplet-based modular architectures.</li> <li>Hardware/software co-design and hardware accelerators for edge and cloud computing.</li> <li>Memory subsystems: SRAM, DRAM, eNVM, MRAM, ReRAM integration.</li> <li>Application-specific architectures for AI, DSP, cryptography, and bioinformatics.</li> </ul> <ol start="4"> <li><strong> Emerging Trends and Technologies</strong></li> </ol> <ul> <li>3D ICs, Through-Silicon Vias (TSVs), and heterogeneous integration.</li> <li>Neuromorphic, brain-inspired, and spiking neural network hardware.</li> <li>Quantum VLSI circuits and cryo-CMOS design challenges.</li> <li>Photonic and plasmonic interconnects and optical VLSI.</li> <li>Approximate computing and in-memory computation (IMC).</li> </ul> <ol start="5"> <li><strong> Hardware Security and Reliability</strong></li> </ol> <ul> <li>Secure VLSI design, side-channel attack mitigation, and logic obfuscation.</li> <li>Hardware Trojans, counterfeit detection, and Physically Unclonable Functions (PUFs).</li> <li>Process variation analysis, aging-aware design, and reliability enhancement techniques.</li> <li>Design-for-testability (DFT), built-in self-test (BIST), and fault modeling.</li> </ul> <ol start="6"> <li><strong> AI and Reconfigurable VLSI Systems</strong></li> </ol> <ul> <li>FPGA/ASIC implementations of deep neural networks, transformers, and edge-AI.</li> <li>Real-time processing using dynamic partial reconfiguration.</li> <li>Hardware-aware neural architecture search (NAS) and pruning techniques.</li> <li>Custom tensor processors and systolic arrays for AI/ML inference and training.</li> </ul> <ol start="7"> <li><strong> Applications and Benchmarking</strong></li> </ol> <ul> <li>VLSI solutions for biomedical implants, autonomous vehicles, IoT, AR/VR, and robotics.</li> <li>Edge-computing accelerators with ultra-low power constraints.</li> <li>Energy-harvesting and battery-less VLSI systems.</li> <li>Benchmarking methodologies for performance, energy-efficiency, and silicon area.</li> </ul> <p>The journal targets academic researchers, VLSI designers, industry professionals, and students, aiming to advance VLSI circuit and system design through high-quality research.<br /><br /><strong>Frequency</strong> - 2 issue Per Year<br /><strong>ISSN</strong> - 2582-1458</p> en-US vlsi@sccts.org (Dr.A.Yamini) scctssociety@gmail.com (M.Kavitha) Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 OJS 3.3.0.22 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Physics-Informed VLSI TinyML-Based Self-Healing PLL with Power–Jitter Optimization Under Aging and PVT Variations https://vlsijournal.com/index.php/vlsi/article/view/321 <p>Phase-locked loops (PLLs) are essential components for generating frequency signals in today’s systems on a chip, but their overall jitter, stability, and behavior in terms of being ‘locked’ to each other can be affected by the varied manufacturing process, operating<br />voltage, and temperature, and long-term aging of the devices as well as other factors (e.g., supply chain issues, etc.). PLLs use feedback to regulate the output frequency, and any of the aforementioned types of variability can result in less-than-optimal characteristics<br />(e.g., loop gain, VCO sensitivity, charge pumps, etc.), thus causing PLLs to drift away from the intended damping and bandwidth; therefore, increasing RMS jitter or forcing conservative guard banding that wastes power. Recent research has demonstrated the continued development of PLL architectures/calibration techniques and how critical it is that, as semiconductor technology continues to scale down, sufficient attention will be paid to ensuring that the PLL user’s dynamic performance remains robust, given the continued variability and reliability issues associated with technology scaling. Additionally, studies on aging have shown that mechanisms like BTI have measurable effects on charge pump operation, underscoring the need for lifetime-based compensation methods rather than fixed margins. This study proposes a physics-informed TinyML self-healing PLL that utilizes (i) on-chip monitors, (ii) a compact TinyML estimator to provide a near-optimal initial knob setting, and (iii) a constrained local refinement stage that enforces power budgets and stability/transient constraints expressed through ζ, wn, resonant peaking Mr, and settling time ts. We formulate runtime tuning as a constrained multi-objective optimization over ICP and loop bandwidth BW. A simulation-centered evaluation using a behavioral CP-PLL model augmented with stochastic PVT spread and aging degradation spans T ∈ [–20,100]ºC, VDD ∈ [0.85, 1.15]V, and aging a ∈ [0, 7] years will be performed with the goal of demonstrating that the proposed method will achieve a significant and consistent reduction in jitter across 1200 random operating conditions for the represented device under the constraints<br />imposed and enforced; conversely, it will be demonstrated that jitter reduction based purely on TinyML decision making will have nonzero violations related to the constraints imposed. The results of the evaluation will demonstrate the practicality of using compact<br />learning in combination with physics-based feasibility checks to achieve predictable self-healing behavior suitable for VLSI clocking subsystems.</p> Isam Aameer Ibrahim, Israa J. Mohammed, Ibtihal Razaq Niama ALRubeei, Naseer Ali Hussien, Hussain Ali Mutar, Haider TH. Salim ALRikabi Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of VLSI Circuits and Systems https://vlsijournal.com/index.php/vlsi/article/view/321 Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 A Low Power and Area Efficient Leading Zero Counter https://vlsijournal.com/index.php/vlsi/article/view/297 <p>The latest and up-to-date arrangements for arithmetic logic units are necessary for modern processors to function effectively. Leading zero counters (LZCs) are indispensable for floating-point operations because they accelerate computational throughput and allow for<br />parallel processing. Advancements in ASIC technology have enabled the development of LZC systems that process information rapidly and use very little energy. The high-speed, energy-efficient performance of Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs) is why they<br />are preferred for creating LZCs in modern computer systems. By reducing the number of transistors required, the proposed LZC architecture results in smaller area and power consumption than other embedded multiplier designs. Of the four techniques, the 32-bit<br />LZC results in a 28.72% space reduction and a 16.44% decrease in power consumption. Similar to 64-bit LZC, the design achieves a 27.65% reduction in area and a 21.64% reduction in power consumption. These changes cause only a small increase in delay compared<br />to LZC done in the past. The design was implemented using Verilog Hardware Description Language (HDL) and processed using the Xilinx Vivado application on the 45 nm technology node. Consequently, the architecture is scalable and easily adapted to modern processing requirements. This architecture significantly reduces energy consumption, contributing to energy-efficient computing systems and supporting sustainable digital infrastructure.</p> N. Hemanth, Sonali Agrawal, M. Vinodhini Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of VLSI Circuits and Systems https://vlsijournal.com/index.php/vlsi/article/view/297 Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200 Generalization-Aware Evaluation of HLS QoR Prediction: In-Distribution Performance versus Cross-Algorithm Generalization Using ForgeHLS https://vlsijournal.com/index.php/vlsi/article/view/372 <p>High-Level Synthesis (HLS) enables efficient FPGA-based accelerator design, but quality-of-results (QoR) exploration remains expensive because accurate latency and resource estimates typically require full synthesis flows. This has motivated the use of machine<br />learning (ML) for early QoR prediction. However, it remains unclear whether strong performance under conventional random train/test splits truly reflects generalization to unseen algorithms. In this work, we study this question using the ForgeHLS design-level dataset. We build a reproducible multitarget QoR prediction pipeline to estimate six metrics: BRAM, LUT, DSP, FF, best-case latency, and worst-case latency. To isolate the effect of the evaluation protocol, we adopt a simple and interpretable Random Forest baseline and evaluate it under two settings: a standard random split and a stricter group split based on algorithm identity. In addition, a boosting-based baseline (XGBoost) is evaluated to verify that the observed behavior is not model-specific. We further repeat the group-based evaluation across multiple random seeds. The results show that the baseline performs strongly under random splitting, especially for BRAM and latency-related targets, but that its performance degrades sharply under group-based evaluation. Repeated group-split experiments confirm that this degradation is systematic rather than incidental. Feature importance analysis further indicates that the strongest predictive signals are closely tied to algorithm identity and source-related information. Overall, the study shows that random-split evaluation can substantially overestimate the true capability of HLS QoR predictors and underscores the importance of generalization-aware evaluation protocols for future ML-based HLS QoR prediction research.</p> Ameen Shaheen, Wael Alzyadat, Aysh Alhroob Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of VLSI Circuits and Systems https://vlsijournal.com/index.php/vlsi/article/view/372 Tue, 08 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200